Qadri leads a long march to nonsense

Capital march Tahir-ul-Qadri promises to take Islamabad by storm on 14 January, Photo: AP

A BARELVI mullah seems to have taken Pakistan by storm, threatening all political stakeholders of dire consequences if they hamper his long march on 14 January. The ostensible objective of Tahir-ul-Qadri, who has the backing of establishment forces such as the Mohajir Quami Movement (MQM) and the Pakistan Muslim League-Q (PML-Q), is to bring safe and clean politics to Pakistan.

Given that the world today is a global village where societies get easily and quickly influenced by each other, the Anna Hazare movement is being replicated in many places with communal or right-wing forces generating their own moral logic to destabilise existing political systems and using the opportunity to launch themselves into power. Although it is not known who exactly is behind Pakistan’s version of Hazare, much work has gone into doctoring Qadri’s résumé and presenting him as a great scholar who has obtained knowledge from all over the Muslim world.

Glancing at his CV, I was reminded of how the Deep State has become a past master in doctoring résumés and personal profiles. If it can create femme fatales with fake PhDs and tout them as defence analysts, it can also make a great scholar out of a mullah from south Punjab, who was initially promoted by the Sharif family in the early 1990s.

Qadri’s religious education was from a madrassa in Jhang rather than the Arab world, which his résumé claims. He subsequently went abroad and got Canadian citizenship. He also established a support network under the umbrella of his outfit, Minhaj-ul-Quran, which claims to be a recipient of funding from expatriate Pakistanis in 90 countries. However, there is no accountability of his organisation or source of funding.

Intriguingly, Qadri landed in Pakistan after a few years to intervene in politics rather than expound his 600-page fatwa against terrorism and suicide bombings, which, incidentally, suffers from its own problems. He promises to take Islamabad by storm with his slogan “intikhab sey pehley inqilab” (revolution before elections). His claim is that the political system is flawed and only the most honest and sagacious should be elected to Parliament. This is exactly the perception of the military establishment, which has grown deeper than the State itself and has acquired more than nine lives.

While army chief Pervez Ashfaq Kayani has made all efforts to present himself to the public as a democracy-loving general who has nothing but support to offer to the politicians, it is a fact that the current political dispensation is not favoured by him, his generals or his men in general. The army is highly suspicious of the PPP’s federal government and PMLN’s provincial government in Punjab due to the covert positions these two parties took for undermining the power of the armed forces. Nawaz Sharif was sacked in 1999 for trying to get rid of an army chief. The PPP government, on the other hand, is not trusted for using external stakeholders to cut the army to size. Most military personnel consider Benazir Bhutto a traitor for handing over the list of Sikh militants to India during her first government (1988-90). The generals are also suspicious of her husband Asif Ali Zardari for using the US to kill the military’s power. They cite the Kerry- Lugar Bill and Memogate as two examples. The former aimed at linking US aid to Pakistan with the army’s subservience to civilian authorities and the latter was about Hussain Haqqani, the PPPappointed ambassador, prodding Washington to take action against the army.

Qadri insists that a caretaker government, which is a constitutional requirement before the general elections, should include the military and judiciary as well. This demand would have a lot of traction among generals and judges, both of whom consider themselves as guardians of the State and its ideology. While the military used to think of itself as a supra-institution, the judiciary has been elevated to a similar self-perception after the restoration of Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry in 2008 as a result of the popular lawyers’ movement.

SO WHAT Pakistan is about to experience possibly on 14 January, when Qadri proposes to lead his long march to Islamabad or even Lahore, is a confluence of right-wing, non-elected forces trying to bring change through extra-constitutional methods. In the light of his own fatwa, such an activity falls in the realm of fitna (chaos) that Qadri believes is highly condemnable. Although the emphasis of his religious opinion is against the use of violence in a Muslim State, there is actually a very thin line between legal and illegal protest against a ruler. The fatwa uses verse after verse and hadith after hadith to claim that instability should not be created in a State even if the ruler is oppressive. Despite Qadri’s argument that religious law allows for a peaceful demonstration, he has not addressed the possibility of a mass mobilisation turning violent, especially in a society where a cocktail of jihadists reign supreme. It was not too long ago that Islamabad, Lahore and Karachi witnessed loot and arson in the name of celebrating love for the prophet.

Be it Hazare or Qadri, these forces represent an unconstitutional challenge to the constitutional and political system of the respective States. We are talking about men who claim higher moral authority to determine what is good for their States and to question the efficacy of the electoral system. Qadri’s partners include the MQM, PML-Q and PTI. These are establishment-created parties, two of which are part of the existing ruling coalition and thus have no leg to stand on for protesting corruption.

At best, Qadri is part of the same extra-constitutional process that hidden hands initiated a couple of years ago through the launch of Imran Khan with a big bang in Lahore. The demand is for bringing a system that is dominated by the middle class, which hopes to replace the existing political actors, presumed to be from the landowning feudals. Such calculation does not take into account the fact that the debate regarding dominance of the feudal system is skewed. Barring Sindh, feudalism has diminished in most other provinces. However, the urban middle class considers almost everyone from a rural background as feudal. Today, there is no party in Pakistan whose top leadership has a feudal background. Even Zardari, who can be criticised for other things, does not represent a feudal family. Personally, he represents the rural middle class. It is the structure of the State that allows for kleptocratic distribution of resources and accumulation of power, capital and opportunities through the manipulation of State power. Thus, the seemingly middle- class military suffers from the same feudal attitude that it accuses others of.

Qadri insists that a caretaker government before the general election should include the military and judiciary

Forces like Qadri or Imran actually represent the new elements who want to dominate the political process in the name of good governance. This is not to argue that Pakistan does not suffer from problems of bad governance. However, the new forces are as authoritarian and feudal in their attitude as those they hope to replace. Moreover, both Qadri and Imran denote the culmination of a psy-ops process in which hidden hands were involved in negative propaganda against political parties and the political system, especially after the 2008 polls.

A perception was generated systematically to show that the incumbent government is highly corrupt and inept. As there is no available research to measure comparative corruption of previous versus existing governments, it is hard to argue that this one has been more corrupt than military regimes led by Zia-ul-Haq, Pervez Musharraf or other dictators.

This is certainly not making a case for the current political stakeholders, but certainly a refutation of the use of any methodology that brings a change unconstitutionally and through undermining the electoral process. Perhaps, it is time for all stakeholders to debate, review and revise the social contract in a manner that changes don’t occur through the backdoor. Unless done the proper way, there is no good Hazare or Qadri.

Siddiqa is an Islamabad-based columnist and the author of Military Inc


  1. I don’t know much about his political innings, nobody can tell when a man could lose one’s mind, but you have forgotten to mention in your article that through his speeches and sermons, he has always urged Muslims to take a moderate and soft path as was the way of the Prophet of Islam. He took on the Wahabbi extremists who take their inspiration from the 8th century imperialist tyrant Yazeed, who martyred Imam Hussain, the only leader in the then middle east, who refused to bow before Yazeed. You forgot to mention that it is Tahir ul Qadri who openly encouraged Muslim women to step out of their homes and play an active role in both private and public life and to travel by using authentic saying of the Prophet to support his claims.

    He reiterated the same on his visit to India where lakhs of moderate Barelvis and Sufi Muslims welcomed him with hope and cheers as he visited Delhi, Bangalore, Mumbai, Hyderabad, Vadodara and Jaipur. Fluent in English, He travelled to the U.S. tying up with the Methodist church and other different Christian organizations to spread the message of interfaith harmony.

    Through out his sermons he preached people to take a middle path in times of conflicts to avoid bloodshed. If only you had gone through some of these speeches rather than just looking at his CV then this article would have been symmetric in its narrative. He may have faked his PhD. But his understanding of Islam is no less than the ones thriving on the royalty of books written on Islam in rich English vocabulary.

  2. this is very surprising to know the peaceful protest become unconstitutional. and constitutional government always run on the path of good governance. some time it becomes authoritative and in case of pak most of the time it has been. no matter Qadri is having fake or original academic document. but the matter is, having academic record is not only way for knowing the humanity and its eternal values. simply because it is one of the way for attainig knowledge there are many way around . and he simply wants change. change for what ? change of so-called constitutional government. when i think of global village , the wave of change had been initiated in Tunisia and spread most part of the third world countries not only in India by Hazare. precisely the voice of Qadri is voice of moderate people of pak .and really they want good governance not good government. that’s why the radical mind set people have problem, problem with Qadri.and people say respected news agency PTI behind Qadri it is pathetic.

  3. well the author express the con part of the TUQ. He is not a diktat clergyman but a world renowned contemporary scholar. His personality raised as bridge between religiosity and spirituality. surely you will find the whole list of his achievements and the services he render, and indeed its merely appreciated. ciao.

  4. A very thoughtful and analytical article. All you wrote seems being materialised today. May God bestow upon our Military and Judiciary sanity not to consider themselves the only ‘guardians of the country’. Let democracy not be derailed at any rate.

  5. There is a lot of debate on Dr. Qadri in media and it is vivid clear that some writers and anchor persons are tilted to protect status quo. And, of course, media is not free from corruption either; hence, can’t be taken on what they say when non-issues are propagated, having failed to respond logically to Dr. Qadri’s concerns and he clarified each point in his interviews in a elaborate and articulate manner.

    Aysha Siddiqa’s article commences with “A Barelvi Mullah…” is a share non-sense as Dr. Qadri didn’t dwell upon religious factionalism being insinuated to sidetrack key concerns of transparency and integrity of electoral process and candidates. This was a vacuum left in system that fetched significant public support when highlighted by Dr. Qadri.

    It is ludicrous that she is not convinced of corruption and consequences of coercive efforts of two major parties to play musical chair while the country is at the brink of economic collapse. First priority is to recourse to get rid of inept and corrupt at the helm of affairs.
    M.A. Chishty, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

  6. Madam, First of all we should not and definitely cannot forget that current democracy is not genuine demo but a highest level of fraud and illusion. Why don’t you see the plight and miseries of the poor people of Pakistan who are just taking breath under the heavy burdon of corruption, embezzlement, nopotism and highest level of hoodwinking to the innocent. Does a person like Zardari is rightful candidate of being President of 180 million people. Do his appointed PM who looted billions of Rupees deserves to be a PM. Why dont you see the miseries and large scale looting and plundering of this nations money. is it right just to criticize a person who simply presented the actual picture their characters. Qadri sb has rightly highlighted the hoodwinking and hypocracy of these dacoits. Are Rehman Malik, Zardari and other looters are person to be trusted.. Secondly you have to right to criticize the military tactics but you should also support their last 5 years detachment from politics. criticizing someone for the sake of just criticism and personal grudges is not logical, moral and ethical. I think you will give a positive consideration to my pleas and facts

  7. The very opening line of Ayesha Siddiqa’s article bears a stench of bias and hatred, the rest, replete with speculations, allegations, and assumptions. How is it even close to being called scholarly? She seems like a conspiracy theorist, who would go to any length to sniff Army’s involvement in every ill Pakistan is facing.

Leave a Reply to zaheer Cancel reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.